Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:31:40 -0400 (EDT) | From | Richard A Nelson <> | Subject | RE: ACPI failure (2.6.0-test<x> and 2.4.22-pre<x>) |
| |
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Grover, Andrew wrote:
> Could you try, say, 2.5.70? That would help me understand if it's a > regression or not.
looks to be the same problem, I got a little more info - and compared it to 2.6.0-test2-mm1; forgive the formatting, this was copied by hand (its a pain being with only one box):
anything before this was cut of by the size of the screen
EIP: 0060: c01efc11 (2.6.0-test2-mm1 version) EFLAGS: 00010202 EIP at: acpi_ut_remove_allocation+0xb5/0x126 EAX: 00000003 EBX: c136c59c ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000001 ESI: 00000000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: cff118c4 ESP: cff118c8 ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068 ... ... acpi_ps_parse_aml+0xa2/0x250 ... acpi_power_add+0x126/0x1c4 ... acpi_bus_scan ...
> If that also fails, then I think determining exactly where it is oopsing > (probably via printks) would be the next best way to go.
From other messages, here I found and extracted the acpi_dsdt.aml if that'll help with anything (can't make much sense of it myself, but was surprised to see special casing for win98/nt/me in the init section)
-- Rick Nelson I can saw a woman in two, but you won't want to look in the box when I do 'For My Next Trick I'll Need a Volunteer' -- Warren Zevon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |