Messages in this thread | | | From | (Måns Rullgård) | Subject | Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches | Date | Mon, 28 Jul 2003 12:37:50 +0200 |
| |
Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org> writes:
>> > It is interesting that Felipe says that stock 2.5.69 was the best CPU >> > scheduler of the 2.5 series. Do others agree with that? > >> No. >> For me, 2.5.63 was the best. Or perhaps it was .64 or .65? > > Well, for me now, the best scheduler is 2.6.0-test2 plus Con's O10 > patch.
Could someone give a brief comparison between Con's O10int and Ingo's G7 patches?
-- Måns Rullgård mru@users.sf.net
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |