lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches
Date
Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org> writes:

>> > It is interesting that Felipe says that stock 2.5.69 was the best CPU
>> > scheduler of the 2.5 series. Do others agree with that?
>
>> No.
>> For me, 2.5.63 was the best. Or perhaps it was .64 or .65?
>
> Well, for me now, the best scheduler is 2.6.0-test2 plus Con's O10
> patch.

Could someone give a brief comparison between Con's O10int and Ingo's
G7 patches?

--
Måns Rullgård
mru@users.sf.net

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.079 / U:5.528 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site