Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: as / scheduler question | From | Robert Love <> | Date | 28 Jul 2003 16:32:26 -0700 |
| |
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 16:25, Con Kolivas wrote:
> If kblockd is reniced to -10 it wont have a problem unless something else > ends up with the same dynamic priority which would only happen if there > are interactive tasks reniced to -10. If it's the only process on the > active array at that priority it _should_ run unaffected.
Even if it is not, it should easily complete what little it has to do within 25ms... so Ingo's patches should not affect it.
Robert Love
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |