[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)
So, in summary, reiser4 will do a good job of flushing in large batches 
using large bios, and that is most of what you can do to optimize for
large erase size.

Things that could be added: improved compression for small files,
garbage collection based freeing of unused blocks, increasing node size
to equal erase size.

We can add such features for a fee, or you can code them yourself and
send us a patch.

If I am wrong about compact flashes all having hardware wear leveling so
that FAT can be used on them, then you can add wear leveling to the list
of features desirable.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.042 / U:3.632 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site