[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)
    Daniel Egger wrote:

    >Am Fre, 2003-07-25 um 15.02 schrieb Nikita Danilov:
    >>No special measures are taken to level block allocation. Wandered blocks
    >>are allocated to improve packing i.e., place blocks of the same file
    >>close to each other. Actually, it tries to place tree nodes in the
    >>parent-first order.
    >So the new blocks are created as close as possible to the old blocks
    >instead of say spreading them as far as possible. This is pretty bad for
    >usage in the embedded world but I guess this is not the market you're
    >aiming at. :(
    I thought that close was fine, it was putting it in the same block that
    was the problem?

    Again, I think this is best solved in the device layer.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.032 / U:11.508 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site