Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 27 Jul 2003 16:59:40 +0400 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3) |
| |
Daniel Egger wrote:
>Am Fre, 2003-07-25 um 15.02 schrieb Nikita Danilov: > > > >>No special measures are taken to level block allocation. Wandered blocks >>are allocated to improve packing i.e., place blocks of the same file >>close to each other. Actually, it tries to place tree nodes in the >>parent-first order. >> >> > >So the new blocks are created as close as possible to the old blocks >instead of say spreading them as far as possible. This is pretty bad for >usage in the embedded world but I guess this is not the market you're >aiming at. :( > > > I thought that close was fine, it was putting it in the same block that was the problem?
Again, I think this is best solved in the device layer.
-- Hans
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |