Messages in this thread | | | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches | Date | Sun, 27 Jul 2003 19:57:01 +1000 |
| |
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 19:24, Ingo Molnar wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > > [...] I feel that Con and Ingo work is starting to collide. > > they do collide only on the patch level - both change the same code. > Otherwise, most of Con's tunings/changes are still valid with my patches > applied - and i'd more than encourage Con's work to continue! Watching the > tuning work i got the impression that the problem areas are suffering from > a lack of infrastructure, not from a lack of tuning. So i introduced 3 new > items: accurate statistics, on-runqueue boosting and timeslice > granularity. The fact that these items improved certain characteristics > (and fixed a couple of corner cases like test-starve.c) prove that it's a > step in the right direction. It's definitely not the final step.
Thanks Ingo. I will continue then and stepwise make use of the extra infrastructure you've made available when I can decide how best to benefit from it.
Con
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |