Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 27 Jul 2003 09:39:20 +0200 | From | Willy Tarreau <> | Subject | Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches |
| |
Hi Con,
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 12:38:37PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> No, this is what I have been trying to figure out; why is it that if we put > all the settings the same as 2.4 that it doesn't perform as nicely. 2.5/6 > with the old settings is certainly better than with the vanilla settings, but > not as good as 2.4 O(1). It does not appear to be scheduler alone, but the > architectural changes to 2.5 that have changed interactivity are here to > stay, and improving the interactivity estimator in the scheduler does help it > anyway.
just a thought : have you tried to set the timer to 100Hz instead of 1kHz to compare with 2.4 ? It might make a difference too.
Cheers, Willy
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |