lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)
From
Date
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 18:10, Daniel Egger wrote:
> Am Son, 2003-07-27 um 15.28 schrieb Hans Reiser:
>
> > it is suitable for any flash device that has wear leveling built into
> > the hardware (e.g. all compact flash cards)
>
> Are you sure CF cards have wear leveling? I'm pretty confident that they
> have defect sector management but no wear leveling. There's a huge
> difference between those two.
>
> > or for which a wear leveling block device driver is used (I don't know
> > if one exists for Linux).
>
> This is normally done by the filesystem (e.g. JFFS2).

Normally device driver should be concerned about making wear out
smaller. It is up to it IMHO.

--
We're flying high, we're watching the world passes by...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans