lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)
    From
    Date
    On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 18:10, Daniel Egger wrote:
    > Am Son, 2003-07-27 um 15.28 schrieb Hans Reiser:
    >
    > > it is suitable for any flash device that has wear leveling built into
    > > the hardware (e.g. all compact flash cards)
    >
    > Are you sure CF cards have wear leveling? I'm pretty confident that they
    > have defect sector management but no wear leveling. There's a huge
    > difference between those two.
    >
    > > or for which a wear leveling block device driver is used (I don't know
    > > if one exists for Linux).
    >
    > This is normally done by the filesystem (e.g. JFFS2).

    Normally device driver should be concerned about making wear out
    smaller. It is up to it IMHO.

    --
    We're flying high, we're watching the world passes by...

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.021 / U:2.448 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site