[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)
On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 18:10, Daniel Egger wrote:
> Am Son, 2003-07-27 um 15.28 schrieb Hans Reiser:
> > it is suitable for any flash device that has wear leveling built into
> > the hardware (e.g. all compact flash cards)
> Are you sure CF cards have wear leveling? I'm pretty confident that they
> have defect sector management but no wear leveling. There's a huge
> difference between those two.
> > or for which a wear leveling block device driver is used (I don't know
> > if one exists for Linux).
> This is normally done by the filesystem (e.g. JFFS2).

Normally device driver should be concerned about making wear out
smaller. It is up to it IMHO.

We're flying high, we're watching the world passes by...

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.132 / U:11.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site