[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 20:19, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> I've no plausible explanation for this; perhaps the only possible one
>> is that one of the algorithms that was sped up was behaving badly enough
>> to interfere with scheduling.

On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 08:31:18PM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> I've also noticed that 2.6.0-test1-wl1A behaves pretty well, given that
> no major changes to the CPU scheduler are included.

Okay, now there's a question of narrowing down which piece of it did
it. It consists of 38 or so pieces so 6 boots should do it.

-- wli
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.069 / U:1.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site