[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches
Con Kolivas wrote:

>. . .
>Actually this is not strange to me. It has become obvious that the problems
>with interactivity that have evolved in 2.5 are not scheduler related. Just
>try plugging in all the old 2.4 O(1) scheduler settings into the current
>scheduler and you will see that it still performs badly. What exactly is the
>cause is a mystery but seems to be more a combination of factors with a
>careful look at the way the vm behaves being part of that. . . .
Any chance that the problem may be due to the block layer system (and
block driver(s)) getting more cycles than it should? Particularly with
the out-of-band like work queue scheduling? That would at least explain
the scheduling oddities I'm seeing with 2.6.0-test1 after a minute of so
of intense I/O.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.178 / U:0.448 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site