lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 18:20, Daniel Egger wrote:
    > Am Fre, 2003-07-25 um 15.02 schrieb Nikita Danilov:
    >
    > > No special measures are taken to level block allocation. Wandered blocks
    > > are allocated to improve packing i.e., place blocks of the same file
    > > close to each other. Actually, it tries to place tree nodes in the
    > > parent-first order.

    >
    > So the new blocks are created as close as possible to the old blocks
    > instead of say spreading them as far as possible. This is pretty bad for
    > usage in the embedded world but I guess this is not the market you're
    > aiming at. :(

    Reiser4 has plugin-based architecture. So, anybody is able to write new
    block allocator plugin.


    Speaking about possible embedded usage... What kind of embedded devices
    do you mean. Reiser4 driver is big enough in size for some of them (for
    instance, for mine MPIO MP3 player :))
    --
    We're flying high, we're watching the world passes by...

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.021 / U:76.152 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site