Messages in this thread | | | From | Denis Vlasenko <> | Subject | Re: [uClinux-dev] Kernel 2.6 size increase - get_current()? | Date | Fri, 25 Jul 2003 10:25:31 +0300 |
| |
On 24 July 2003 11:13, Ihar \"Philips\" Filipau wrote: > I mean 'inline' which means 'this has to be inlined or it will > break' and 'inline' which means 'inline this please - it adds only 10k > of code bloat and improve performance in my suppa-puppa-bench by 0.000001%!' > > Strictly speaking - separate 'inline' to 'require_inline' and > 'better_inline'. > So people who really care about image size - can turn > 'better_inline' into void, without harm to functionality. > Actually I saw real performance improvements on my Pentium MMX 133 > (it has $i16k+$d16k of caches I beleive) when I was cutting some of > inlines out. and I'm not talking about (cache poor) embedded systems...
Which inlines? Let the list know -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |