lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [uClinux-dev] Kernel 2.6 size increase - get_current()?
Date
On 24 July 2003 11:13, Ihar \"Philips\" Filipau wrote:
> I mean 'inline' which means 'this has to be inlined or it will
> break' and 'inline' which means 'inline this please - it adds only 10k
> of code bloat and improve performance in my suppa-puppa-bench by 0.000001%!'
>
> Strictly speaking - separate 'inline' to 'require_inline' and
> 'better_inline'.
> So people who really care about image size - can turn
> 'better_inline' into void, without harm to functionality.
> Actually I saw real performance improvements on my Pentium MMX 133
> (it has $i16k+$d16k of caches I beleive) when I was cutting some of
> inlines out. and I'm not talking about (cache poor) embedded systems...

Which inlines? Let the list know
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.057 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site