[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [uClinux-dev] Kernel 2.6 size increase - get_current()?
On Thursday, Jul 24, 2003, at 14:37 US/Central, Alan Cox wrote:

> On Iau, 2003-07-24 at 16:30, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>> So you're arguing for more inlining, because icache speculative
>> prefetch will pick up the inlined code?
> I'm arguing for short inlined fast paths and non inlined unusual
> paths.
>> Or you're arguing for less, because code like get_current() which is
>> called frequently could have a single copy living in icache?
> Depends how much the jump costs you.

And also how big your icache is, and maybe even cpu/bus ratio, etc...
which depend on the arch of course.

So as I saw Ihar suggest earlier in this thread, perhaps there should
be two inline directives: must_inline (for code whose correctness
depends on it) and could_help_performance_inline. Then different archs
could #define could_help_performance_inline as appropriate.

Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.075 / U:9.724 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site