Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 23 Jul 2003 14:54:49 -0400 (EDT) | From | Glenn Fowler <> | Subject | Re: kernel bug in socketpair() |
| |
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:23:07 -0700 David S. Miller wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 14:14:57 -0400 (EDT) > Glenn Fowler <gsf@research.att.com> wrote:
> > named sockets seem a little heavyweight for this application
> I think it'll be cheaper than unnamed unix sockets and > groveling in /proc/*/fd/
> And even if there is a minor performance issue, you'll more than get > that back due to the portability gain. :-)
named unix sockets reside in the fs namespace, no? so they must be linked to a dir before use and unlinked after use the unlink after use would be particularly tricky for the parent process implementing cmd <(cmd ...) ...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |