[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD
>> >> If everyone spent the time replacing bitkeeper instead of beating
>> up Larry they'd get a lot further.
>> > Linux isn't the only free operating system in existance, and
>> although BK seems to suit the requirements of a lot of Linux
>> developers, that doesn't mean that it meets the requirements of
>> other free OS
>> > development teams.
>> > I strongly suspect that we'll see a free SCM developed after a few
>> more years of HURD development, for example.
>> > Doesn't mean we'll switch to it, though, we haven't switched to my
>> bug database, have we? :-).
>> > John.
>> Given that large chunks of HURD come from Linux, please refer to it as
>> Linux/HURD.
> What HURD code comes from Linux? GNU/Mach uses code from Linux, but not
> HURD as far as I know.

Hi John!
Go take a look at their networking, and IDE code.

This email was sent using SquirrelMail.
"Webmail for nuts!"

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.054 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site