[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD
    >> >> If everyone spent the time replacing bitkeeper instead of beating
    >> up Larry they'd get a lot further.
    >> > Linux isn't the only free operating system in existance, and
    >> although BK seems to suit the requirements of a lot of Linux
    >> developers, that doesn't mean that it meets the requirements of
    >> other free OS
    >> > development teams.
    >> > I strongly suspect that we'll see a free SCM developed after a few
    >> more years of HURD development, for example.
    >> > Doesn't mean we'll switch to it, though, we haven't switched to my
    >> bug database, have we? :-).
    >> > John.
    >> Given that large chunks of HURD come from Linux, please refer to it as
    >> Linux/HURD.
    > What HURD code comes from Linux? GNU/Mach uses code from Linux, but not
    > HURD as far as I know.

    Hi John!
    Go take a look at their networking, and IDE code.

    This email was sent using SquirrelMail.
    "Webmail for nuts!"

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.021 / U:81.364 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site