[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Bitkeeper
    In my mind it's absolutely not worth it. I believe there are
    non-commercial protocol gateways from which a copy of linux (complete
    with historical BK metadata) can be pulled and converted from.

    Larry has his views whether 99.9999% of people disagree with him or not.
    He can change the protocol as he sees fit, and we can pull the source
    off of BK if we want.

    He has stated before, it would be no skin off his balls (to paraphrase).

    On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 15:30, Michael Buesch wrote:
    > First I think, this list isn't the correct place for starting
    > a bk-flame again.
    > But I also share your opinion, that it's time to write even a
    > free client.
    > But how hard will it be? How big is the knowlege of the
    > protocols bk uses? It'll be not easy, but for sure very interesting.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.019 / U:27.556 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site