[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PATCH: typo bits
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 07:33:19AM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:

> | Isosynchronous is (was?) not an English word.
> |
> | Oh, but we aren't speaking English - this is about USB devices.
> | Read the USB standard and see that it has an isosynchronous mode.
> It does? I can't find it in the main USB 2.0 spec.
> It discusses isochronous, which is what I would prefer to see,
> regardless of the USB spec.

Ah, yes, you are right. I did a grep on the USB docs directory
and it is full of isosynchronous, but those are all fragments
from the net. The actual standards correctly use isochronous.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.046 / U:5.028 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site