lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] PATCH: typo bits
    On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 07:33:19AM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:

    > | Isosynchronous is (was?) not an English word.
    > |
    > | Oh, but we aren't speaking English - this is about USB devices.
    > | Read the USB standard and see that it has an isosynchronous mode.
    >
    > It does? I can't find it in the main USB 2.0 spec.
    > It discusses isochronous, which is what I would prefer to see,
    > regardless of the USB spec.

    Ah, yes, you are right. I did a grep on the USB docs directory
    and it is full of isosynchronous, but those are all fragments
    from the net. The actual standards correctly use isochronous.
    Sorry.

    Andries

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.055 / U:0.356 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site