lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PATCH: typo bits
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 07:33:19AM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:

> | Isosynchronous is (was?) not an English word.
> |
> | Oh, but we aren't speaking English - this is about USB devices.
> | Read the USB standard and see that it has an isosynchronous mode.
>
> It does? I can't find it in the main USB 2.0 spec.
> It discusses isochronous, which is what I would prefer to see,
> regardless of the USB spec.

Ah, yes, you are right. I did a grep on the USB docs directory
and it is full of isosynchronous, but those are all fragments
from the net. The actual standards correctly use isochronous.
Sorry.

Andries

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans