lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Make CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP independend on CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND

> I do not really like the placement; process suspension is not really a
> device driver. What about kernel/power/*.c, instead?

The only reason I put it there is because the new PM code that I've been
working on contains an abstraction layer and registration mechanism for
the architecture-specific PM hooks (i.e. drivers for the low-level
code), and it will contain the driver suspend/resume code.

It seemed as good a place as any for it, though I personally don't have a
preference. Does anyone else care?


-pat

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.063 / U:1.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site