Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Jul 2003 06:44:36 -0700 (PDT) | From | Patrick Mochel <> | Subject | Re: Make CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP independend on CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND |
| |
> I do not really like the placement; process suspension is not really a > device driver. What about kernel/power/*.c, instead?
The only reason I put it there is because the new PM code that I've been working on contains an abstraction layer and registration mechanism for the architecture-specific PM hooks (i.e. drivers for the low-level code), and it will contain the driver suspend/resume code.
It seemed as good a place as any for it, though I personally don't have a preference. Does anyone else care?
-pat
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |