Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:27:37 +0200 | From | Jens Axboe <> | Subject | Re: RFC on io-stalls patch |
| |
On Tue, Jul 15 2003, Alan Cox wrote: > On Maw, 2003-07-15 at 06:26, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Sorry, but I think that is nonsense. This is the way we have always > > worked. You just have to maintain a decent queue length still (like we > > always have in 2.4) and there are no problems. > > The memory pinning problem is still real - and always has been. It shows up > best not on IDE disks but large slow media like magneto opticals where you > can queue lots of I/O but you get 500K/second
Not the same thing. On slow media, like dvd-ram, what causes the problem is that you can dirty basically all of the RAM in the system. That has nothing to do with memory pinned in the request queue.
And that is still writes, not reads. Reads are pinned on the queue, so very different case.
-- Jens Axboe
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |