Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Jul 2003 06:44:49 +1200 | From | Nigel Cunningham <> | Subject | Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: Thoughts wanted on merging Software Suspend enhancements |
| |
Hi.
It defaults to disabled precisely because of Pavel's concerns.
Regards,
Nigel
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 05:30, Jan Rychter wrote: > >>>>> "Pavel" == Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> writes: > Pavel> Hi! > >> Having listened to the arguments, I'll make pressing Escape to > >> cancel the suspend a feature which defaults to being disabled and > >> can be enabled via a proc entry in 2.4. I won't add code to poll for > >> ACPI (or APM) events :> > > Pavel> At least no new proc entry, please. Make it depend on > Pavel> sysrq_enabled and disable it completely if sysrq support is not > Pavel> compiled in. > > Pavel, I disagree. This is important functionality. I *do* want to abort > suspends by pressing 'Esc'. > > I do not believe that hiding this gives you any extra security, and I do > not believe that having it in is any kind of a problem. None of your > arguments against it convinced me. > > Please do not try to hide it and obscure it any more than it already is > (Nigel has made this default to off for some reason). > > --J. -- Nigel Cunningham 495 St Georges Road South, Hastings 4201, New Zealand
You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless, Christ died for the ungodly. -- Romans 5:6, NIV.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |