lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [Swsusp-devel] Re: Thoughts wanted on merging Software Suspend enhancements
Date
On Monday 14 July 2003 09:54, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Okay.
>
> Having listened to the arguments, I'll make pressing Escape to cancel
> the suspend a feature which defaults to being disabled and can be
> enabled via a proc entry in 2.4.

OK!

I won't add code to poll for ACPI (or
> APM) events :>

Sounds like a reasonable tradeoff

>
> Regards,
>
> Nigel
>
> On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 09:09, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > Escape is more intuitively obvious though - I would expect the suspend
> > > button to only start a suspend. And the idea of escape cancelling
> > > anything is well in-grained in peoples' minds.
> >
> > You did not initiate suspend from keyboard => you should not
> > terminate it from keyboard.
> >


Overruled ;)
--
Powered by linux-2.5.75-mm1. Compiled with gcc-2.95-3 - mature and rock solid

My current linux related activities:
- 2.5 yenta_socket testing
- Test development and testing of swsusp for 2.4/2.5 and ACPI S3 of 2.5 kernel
- Everyday usage of 2.5 kernel

More info on 2.5 kernel: http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/post-halloween-2.5.txt
More info on swsusp: http://sourceforge.net/projects/swsusp/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site