lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [Swsusp-devel] Re: Thoughts wanted on merging Software Suspend enhancements
    Date
    On Monday 14 July 2003 09:54, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
    > Okay.
    >
    > Having listened to the arguments, I'll make pressing Escape to cancel
    > the suspend a feature which defaults to being disabled and can be
    > enabled via a proc entry in 2.4.

    OK!

    I won't add code to poll for ACPI (or
    > APM) events :>

    Sounds like a reasonable tradeoff

    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > Nigel
    >
    > On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 09:09, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > > Hi!
    > >
    > > > Escape is more intuitively obvious though - I would expect the suspend
    > > > button to only start a suspend. And the idea of escape cancelling
    > > > anything is well in-grained in peoples' minds.
    > >
    > > You did not initiate suspend from keyboard => you should not
    > > terminate it from keyboard.
    > >


    Overruled ;)
    --
    Powered by linux-2.5.75-mm1. Compiled with gcc-2.95-3 - mature and rock solid

    My current linux related activities:
    - 2.5 yenta_socket testing
    - Test development and testing of swsusp for 2.4/2.5 and ACPI S3 of 2.5 kernel
    - Everyday usage of 2.5 kernel

    More info on 2.5 kernel: http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/post-halloween-2.5.txt
    More info on swsusp: http://sourceforge.net/projects/swsusp/

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.024 / U:36.464 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site