[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: utimes/futimes/lutimes syscalls
    Ulrich Drepper <> wrote:
    > If
    > there are filesystems which store the sub-seconds on disk I think this
    > is necessary since otherwise all kinds of programs (including archives)
    > cannot be written correctly. If the sub-seconds only live in memory I
    > still think it would be good to have the syscalls but it would not be
    > that urgent.

    XFS (at least) stores nanoseconds on disk. So yes, I think we should make
    this change.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.021 / U:6.452 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site