[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: utimes/futimes/lutimes syscalls
Ulrich Drepper <> wrote:
> If
> there are filesystems which store the sub-seconds on disk I think this
> is necessary since otherwise all kinds of programs (including archives)
> cannot be written correctly. If the sub-seconds only live in memory I
> still think it would be good to have the syscalls but it would not be
> that urgent.

XFS (at least) stores nanoseconds on disk. So yes, I think we should make
this change.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.040 / U:1.360 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site