lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: utimes/futimes/lutimes syscalls
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> If
> there are filesystems which store the sub-seconds on disk I think this
> is necessary since otherwise all kinds of programs (including archives)
> cannot be written correctly. If the sub-seconds only live in memory I
> still think it would be good to have the syscalls but it would not be
> that urgent.

XFS (at least) stores nanoseconds on disk. So yes, I think we should make
this change.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans