lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Coding standards. (Was: Re: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block)
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, [iso-8859-1] J?rn Engel wrote:
>
>
>>In the case of the kernel, there is quite a bit of horrible coding
>>style. But a working device driver for some hardware is always better
>>that no working device driver for some hardware, and if enforcing the
>>coding style more results is scaring away some driver writers, the
>>style clearly loses.
>
>
> There's no such a thing as "horrible coding style", since coding style is
> strictly personal. Whoever try to convince you that one style is better
> than another one is simply plain wrong. Every reason they will give you to
> justify one style can be wiped with other opposite reasons. The only
> horrible coding style is to not respect coding standards when you work
> inside a project.

I beg to differ: http://www0.us.ioccc.org/2001/anonymous.c ;)

Eli
--------------------. "If it ain't broke now,
Eli Carter \ it will be soon." -- crypto-gram
eli.carter(a)inet.com `-------------------------------------------------

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.094 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site