lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: SCO's claims seem empty
From
Date
On Gwe, 2003-06-06 at 13:31, Martin List-Petersen wrote
> Besides this article states confirmation on similar code, still i would say: Did
> it come from Linux orginally or did it come from SCO ?
>
> http://informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=10300314

If it isn't simply carefully doctored choices designed mislead clueless
analysts. You are also ignoring at least two other things - code that is
common because its from the reference (eg intel locking code) and code
from third party vendors legitimately supplied to both Linux and SCO.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.150 / U:4.908 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site