lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: /proc/bus/pci
    On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Albert Cahalan wrote:
    >> Some of the IBMers use "phb" instead of "hose" or "domain".

    On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 08:51:31AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > Gods, did they run out of vowels in _that_ part of IBM too?
    > Where do they go? Is there somebody at IBM that hoards vowels, and will
    > one day hold the rest of the world hostage? "Mwahahahaa! If you don't buy
    > support from IBM, you can never use the letter 'A' again! Whahahahhhaah!".
    > I can see it now.
    > What the _f*ck_ is wrong with just calling it "PCI domain". It's a fine
    > word, and yes, "domain" is used commonly in computer language, but that's
    > a _good_ thing. Everybody immediately understands what it is about.
    > There is no goodness to acronyms where you have to be some "insider" to
    > know what the hell it means. That "hose" thing has the same problem: I
    > don't know about anybody else, but to me a "hose" is a logn narrow conduit
    > for water, and a "PCI hose" doesn't much make sense to me.
    > A "phb" just makes me go "Whaa?"

    I've never seen this; however, I've seen "PCI segment" used in some
    Intel docs. I do agree that neither "phb" nor "hose" are particularly
    nice nomenclature.

    -- wli
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.020 / U:3.888 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site