lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [BK PATCH] acpismp=force fix
From
Date
>>>>> "brown," == Brown, Len <len.brown@intel.com> writes:

Hi

brown,> To disable HT on a uni-processor, wouldn't it be preferable to simply run
brown,> the UP kernel rather than the SMP kernel with HT disabled? That leaves SMP
brown,> systems, where either the BIOS could disable it (it is a BIOS bug if it
brown,> can't), or as a last resort CONFIG_X86_HT (2.5) could be config'd out of the
brown,> kernel. I guess I've talked myself into not missing "noht" also.

noht is very useful for distributions, we already have to do a lot of
kernels, any option that "mandates" to compile a different kernel is
just bad (IMHO).

Later, Juan.

--
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they
are different -- Larry McVoy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:5.938 / U:0.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site