Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [BK PATCH] acpismp=force fix | From | Juan Quintela <> | Date | Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:42:29 +0200 |
| |
>>>>> "brown," == Brown, Len <len.brown@intel.com> writes:
Hi
brown,> To disable HT on a uni-processor, wouldn't it be preferable to simply run brown,> the UP kernel rather than the SMP kernel with HT disabled? That leaves SMP brown,> systems, where either the BIOS could disable it (it is a BIOS bug if it brown,> can't), or as a last resort CONFIG_X86_HT (2.5) could be config'd out of the brown,> kernel. I guess I've talked myself into not missing "noht" also.
noht is very useful for distributions, we already have to do a lot of kernels, any option that "mandates" to compile a different kernel is just bad (IMHO).
Later, Juan.
-- In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they are different -- Larry McVoy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |