[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: File System conversion -- ideas
    On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 03:45:41PM -0400, rmoser wrote:

    > >> seen this written by many people who choose to use ext3. Thus proving
    > >> that there is value in in-place filesystem conversion :)
    > >
    > >Uh-huh. You want to get in-kernel conversion between ext* and reiserfs?
    > >With recoverable state if aborted? Get real.
    > no, in-kernel conversion between everything. You don't think it can be done?
    > It's not that difficult a problem to manage data like that :D

    I think that I will believe it when I see the patchset implementing it.
    Provided that it will be convincing enough. Other than that... Not
    really. You will need code for each pair of filesystems, since
    convertor will need to know *both* layouts. No amount of handwaving
    is likely to work around that. And we have what, something between
    10 and 20 local filesystems? Have fun...

    If you want your idea to be considered seriously - take reiserfs code,
    take ext3 code, copy both to userland and put together a conversion
    between them. Both ways. That, by definition, is easier than doing
    it in kernel - you have the same code available and none of the limitations/
    interaction with other stuff. When you have it working, well, time to
    see what extra PITA will come from making it coexist with other parts
    of kernel (and with much more poor runtime environment).

    AFAICS, it is _very_ hard to implement. Even outside of the kernel.
    If you can get it done - well, that might do a lot for having the
    idea considered seriously. "Might" since you need to do it in a way
    that would survive transplantation into the kernel _and_ would scale
    better that O((number of filesystem types)^2).
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.019 / U:29.400 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site