Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 28 Jun 2003 14:15:38 +0200 | From | (Margit Schubert-While) | Subject | Re: 2.4.22-pre2 unresolved proc_get_inode |
| |
Fine by me :-) Don't use it, don't need it. As a matter of course, I throw a standard Suse config in and answer "m"/"y" to the new stuff. Serves to shake out a few things.
Margit
At 12:21 28.06.2003 +0100, Viro wrote: >On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 12:40:36PM +0200, Margit Schubert-While wrote: > > if [ -r System.map ]; then /sbin/depmod -ae -F System.map 2.4.22-pre2; fi > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in > > /lib/modules/2.4.22-pre2/kernel/drivers/net/wan/comx.o > > depmod: proc_get_inode > > > > I suppose we let Christoph and Marc fight it out. > >You know what? I'm so fed up with that crap, that today Marcelo will >get a patch killing proc_get_inode(), making proc_lookup() static and >eliminating ->proc_iops completely. > >Enough is enough. comx is the only user of that crap and all procfs >code in comx is broken by design and trivially exploitable. It's >unsalvagable and any attempt to fix it will amount to rewrite from >scratch anyway. > >It's not a new problem, it had been discussed to hell and back and >comx folks could not have been arsed to do anything about it in what, >3 years?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |