lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org
> If some low-value stuff leaks through then ho-hum, at least it was
> on-topic. It is not as if we are unused to low-value content...

;-)

> It would be good if pure administrata such as changing the status were
> filtered.

That should be easy enough.

> In fact, there is probably no point in sending anything bugzilla->list apart
> from the initial report. If the bug is then pursued via bugzilla then OK.
> If is is pursued via email then bugzilla just captures the discussion.

OK, but I'm pretty much doing that already. I try to filter out some of
the "bugs with no content". So it sounds like the issue is more the
loop from email back in. Will see what I can get done - have to schedule
some time from the admins.

>> 2. email back in.
>>
>> Email back in is harder, and needs more thought as to how to make it
>> easy to use, whilst avoiding logging crap (eg. ensuing flamewars that
>> derive from the bug reports, etc).
>
> Well hopefully people will have the sense to cut the bugzilla address off
> the Cc line if it drifts off-topic.

Fairy nuff.

>> My intuition is to log replies by
>> default, and hack off certain threads by hand
>
> Nah. Just log everything and hack off the crap by larting people.

Heh. need to get a good "remote slap protocol" implemented. Perhaps
the net guys can write us an RFC for it ;-)

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.067 / U:2.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site