Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 27 Jun 2003 23:08:12 -0700 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org |
| |
> If some low-value stuff leaks through then ho-hum, at least it was > on-topic. It is not as if we are unused to low-value content...
;-)
> It would be good if pure administrata such as changing the status were > filtered.
That should be easy enough.
> In fact, there is probably no point in sending anything bugzilla->list apart > from the initial report. If the bug is then pursued via bugzilla then OK. > If is is pursued via email then bugzilla just captures the discussion.
OK, but I'm pretty much doing that already. I try to filter out some of the "bugs with no content". So it sounds like the issue is more the loop from email back in. Will see what I can get done - have to schedule some time from the admins.
>> 2. email back in. >> >> Email back in is harder, and needs more thought as to how to make it >> easy to use, whilst avoiding logging crap (eg. ensuing flamewars that >> derive from the bug reports, etc). > > Well hopefully people will have the sense to cut the bugzilla address off > the Cc line if it drifts off-topic.
Fairy nuff.
>> My intuition is to log replies by >> default, and hack off certain threads by hand > > Nah. Just log everything and hack off the crap by larting people.
Heh. need to get a good "remote slap protocol" implemented. Perhaps the net guys can write us an RFC for it ;-)
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |