[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH][RFC] irq handling code consolidation (common part)
Andrey Panin <> writes:
> BTW sparc implementation of irq_itoa() uses static buffer for the formatted
> string, is it really irq/preempt safe ?

Passinf in a result buffer seems simplest (maybe have the arch define a
macro for the max-length).

[btw the name `irq_itoa' seems a bit odd; how about `irq_name' (or
`irq_rep' for clu-lovers)?]

Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it
has to be us. -- Jerry Garcia
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.030 / U:3.004 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site