[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH][RFC] irq handling code consolidation (common part)
    Andrey Panin <> writes:
    > BTW sparc implementation of irq_itoa() uses static buffer for the formatted
    > string, is it really irq/preempt safe ?

    Passinf in a result buffer seems simplest (maybe have the arch define a
    macro for the max-length).

    [btw the name `irq_itoa' seems a bit odd; how about `irq_name' (or
    `irq_rep' for clu-lovers)?]

    Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it
    has to be us. -- Jerry Garcia
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.019 / U:6.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site