Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:26:23 +0200 | From | Vojtech Pavlik <> | Subject | Re: Crusoe's performance on linux? |
| |
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:58:12AM +0700, Samphan Raruenrom wrote:
> Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > Could you a test just for me? Take vanilla 2.4.21 and then > > make oldconfig; make dep; time make bzImage > > That's basically what I want to know how long will take, since > > it's one of the most common time consuming tasks the thing will > > have to handle. > Done! Here're the results:- > > Desktop - Pentium III 1 G Hz 754 MB -> 10.x min. > Tablet PC - Crusoe TM5800 1 GHz 731 MB -> 17.x min. > > From freshdiagnos benchmack, the TPC has about 2x faster RAM. > I use tmpfs for the whole process so disk speed didn't count. > Both test run without X or any foreground process using > 2.4.21-ac1 and RedHat kernel.
Desktop - 1.1 GHz Athlon Tbird 512M RAM, using disk -> 3.7 min
This is with gcc 2.95.2, which may give it an unfair advantage, though. Or is something else wrong here?
-- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs, SuSE CR - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |