Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: [BK PATCH] acpismp=force fix | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Date | 23 Jun 2003 10:01:42 +0200 |
| |
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 09:43, Grover, Andrew wrote: > > From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@digeo.com] > > > ACPI: make it so acpismp=force works (reported by Andrew Morton) > > > But prior to 2.5.72, CPU enumeration worked fine without > > acpismp=force. > > Now it is required. How come? > > (I'm taking the liberty to update the subject, which I accidentally left > blank) > > Because 2.4 has that behavior. One objection that people raised to > applying the 2.4 ACPI patch was that it changed that behavior. So I made > an effort to keep it there.
in 2.4 it is absolutely not mantadory; it's default actually if the cpu advertises the "ht" flag..... [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |