[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: GCC speed (was [PATCH] Isapnp warning)
Daniel Phillips <> wrote:
> As for compilation speed, yes, that sucks. I doubt there's any rational
> reason for it, but I also agree with the idea that correctness and binary
> code performance should come first, then the compilation speed issue should
> be addressed.

No. Compilation inefficiency directly harms programmer efficiency and the
quality and volume of code the programmer produces. These are surely the
most important things by which a toolchain's usefulness should be judged.

I compile with -O1 all the time and couldn't care the teeniest little bit
about the performance of the generated code - it just doesn't matter.

I'm happy allowing those thousands of people who do not compile kernels all
the time to shake out any 3.2/3.3 compilation problems.

Compilation inefficiency is the most serious thing wrong with gcc.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.109 / U:4.300 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site