Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: gcc 3.3: largest *and* smallest kernels (was Re: [PATCH] Isapnp warning) | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 22 Jun 2003 12:31:17 +0100 |
| |
On Sul, 2003-06-22 at 06:39, Barry K. Nathan wrote: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 07:17:05PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Compared to 2.95.3, gcc-3.3 takes 1.5x as long to compile, and produces a > > kernel which is 200k larger. > > > > It is simply worthless. > > gcc 2.95.3 does compile faster than 3.3, but I don't think 3.3 is simply > worthless:
With 2.95 people did benchmarks a long time back and -Os was outperforming -O2 on some platforms at least. I'd bet the same is true with 3.3 on a celeron too
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |