[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] reimplement pci proc name
    On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 04:02:28PM +0200, Martin Zwickel wrote:
    > Hi Matthew!
    > Just one question:
    > If pci_name_bus copies the bus' hex to name and always returns 0,
    > the "if (!pci_name_bus(name, bus)) return -EEXIST;" would always be true, right?
    > Or did I miss something?

    That's currently correct. My understanding is that some architectures
    would like to decline to create overlapping bus numbers.

    "It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
    victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
    Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.018 / U:35.072 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site