lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71]
    On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Larry McVoy wrote:

    > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:11:07PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    > > Followup to: <20030618011455.GF542@hopper.phunnypharm.org>
    > > By author: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
    > > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
    > > > >
    > > > > I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in kernel.org if people are OK with
    > > > > it. Setting up actual servers is another matter.
    > > >
    > > > CNAMES on kernel.org would be perfect.
    > > >
    > >
    > > So right now cvs, svn and bk all -> kernel.bkbits.net?
    >
    > We only need cvs and svn; bk is hosted at linux.bkbits.net.

    Why would you *not* have bk.kernel.org as a CNAME? For ease of memory,
    etc, it makes sense to do that. If someone knows about cvs.kernel.org,
    they are more likely to guess the bk address. And vice-versa, of course.

    --
    bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
    CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
    Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.020 / U:0.076 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site