lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71]
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Larry McVoy wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:11:07PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Followup to: <20030618011455.GF542@hopper.phunnypharm.org>
> > By author: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> > > >
> > > > I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in kernel.org if people are OK with
> > > > it. Setting up actual servers is another matter.
> > >
> > > CNAMES on kernel.org would be perfect.
> > >
> >
> > So right now cvs, svn and bk all -> kernel.bkbits.net?
>
> We only need cvs and svn; bk is hosted at linux.bkbits.net.

Why would you *not* have bk.kernel.org as a CNAME? For ease of memory,
etc, it makes sense to do that. If someone knows about cvs.kernel.org,
they are more likely to guess the bk address. And vice-versa, of course.

--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans