[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: common name for the kernel DSO
Followup to:  <>
By author: David Mosberger <>
In newsgroup:
> Both x86 and ia64 now provide a dynamically shared object (DSO) for
> system call purposes (e.g., to speed up system calls and for signal
> trampoline/sigreturn purposes). At the moment, the names of these
> DSOs are different:
> x86:
> ia64:
> I think there is some value in using the same name on all platforms
> that support such a DSO. vsyscall makes no sense for ia64, since
> there are no virtual syscalls (instead, ia64 linux provides a fast
> system call convention which, when coupled with light-weight system
> call handlers, provide full syscall semantics at more or less the
> speed of virtual system calls).
> Not surprisingly, I like the name "linux-gate", since that is really
> what this DSO is all about: it's a gateway between user and kernel
> space. However, if this name isn't appropriate for x86, perhaps we
> can find another name which will be acceptable to everybody.

It's a pretty ugly name, quite frankly, since it doesn't explain what
it is a gate from or to. or
would make a lot more sense.

<> at work, <> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.067 / U:2.872 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site