Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:55:54 +0100 | From | viro@parcelfa ... | Subject | Re: [PATCH] VFS autmounter support v2 |
| |
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:46:50AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Besides, going back to your original argument, I think you make an invalid > assertion: > > Namespaces are completely unrelated - I have them set for two > different users that happen to need some common files, but otherwise > have very different environments. > > They are not quite completely unrelated. The only way (or so it seems) to get > a new namespace is to derive one by way of CLONE_NS. This clones the namespace > of the parent, and so the child's namespace then should have all the features > of the parent's namespace _UNTIL_ at such time the child or one of its > descendents rearranges the topology!
And how the fuck do you "rearrange topology" with your patch?!? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |