[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71]

    On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 08:38:16PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
    > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:55:47PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    > > Larry McVoy wrote:
    > > >
    > > > It seems to me that is the right place but if hpa is too busy
    > > > (which I understand and respect) then we need to come up with some sort of
    > > > domain which is unused, simple, and memorable. I'm aware of the levels of
    > > > distrust people have for bitmover but we could pay for it and run the DNS
    > > > servers and let some set of community agreed on people manage the DNS entries
    > > > if that makes people feel safe.
    > > >
    > >
    > > I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in if people are OK with
    > > it. Setting up actual servers is another matter.
    > I think CNAMEs are all that we need now. BitMover and Penguin Computing
    > will host it for the time being and if we cross over to the dark side
    > someone else can step forward and host it and all you need to do is redo
    > the CNAMEs.
    > We do need to advertise the "URLs" for the CVS tree and the SVN tree and
    > the BK trees as well I suppose. Is that a Gooch/FAQ thing? Richard, you
    > still out there?

    this sounds fine to me. especially I can't think of an easier name to
    remeber than ;)

    thanks for taking care of those bits too.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.036 / U:0.096 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site