[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: SCM domains [was Re: Linux 2.5.71]

On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 08:38:16PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 06:55:47PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Larry McVoy wrote:
> > >
> > > It seems to me that is the right place but if hpa is too busy
> > > (which I understand and respect) then we need to come up with some sort of
> > > domain which is unused, simple, and memorable. I'm aware of the levels of
> > > distrust people have for bitmover but we could pay for it and run the DNS
> > > servers and let some set of community agreed on people manage the DNS entries
> > > if that makes people feel safe.
> > >
> >
> > I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in if people are OK with
> > it. Setting up actual servers is another matter.
> I think CNAMEs are all that we need now. BitMover and Penguin Computing
> will host it for the time being and if we cross over to the dark side
> someone else can step forward and host it and all you need to do is redo
> the CNAMEs.
> We do need to advertise the "URLs" for the CVS tree and the SVN tree and
> the BK trees as well I suppose. Is that a Gooch/FAQ thing? Richard, you
> still out there?

this sounds fine to me. especially I can't think of an easier name to
remeber than ;)

thanks for taking care of those bits too.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.038 / U:0.408 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site