lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: bad: scheduling while atomic!
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 06:14:38PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 14:29, Russell King wrote:
> > It would be useful if we could balance the spin_locks with the
> > spin_unlocks. 8)
>
> I can see how that could be considered appropriate. There are a handful
> of other such trivia in CVS which want to go to Linus shortly -- I
> assume that includes your afs partitioning fix?

Yes, although I was considering sending that one myself. If you're due
to do another sync up, feel free to include that.

--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.029 / U:7.464 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site