[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] udev enhancements to use kernel event queue
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 16:34, Patrick Mochel wrote:

> > Nice thinking. It is a shame we need a lock for this, but we don't
> > have an atomic_inc_and_return().
> Those were my sentiments exactly:


> +static inline int atomic_inc_and_read(atomic_t *v)
> +{
> + __asm__ __volatile__(
> + LOCK "incl %0"
> + :"=m" (v->counter)
> + :"m" (v->counter));
> + return v->counter;
> +}

What prevents a race between the increment and the return (i.e. you
return v->counter after another person also increments it)? Only the
increment is guaranteed atomic.

I think you need to copy the result of the increment into a local
variable _inside_ of the LOCK and return that. Whether or not that will
work sanely on all architectures I dunno.

Robert Love

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.089 / U:2.852 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site