[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] udev enhancements to use kernel event queue
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 16:25, Patrick Mochel wrote:

> Yeah, how about this ammended patch?

Both this and Greg's look fine.

I guess this is preferred, since the lock hold time is shorter :)

> + spin_lock(&sequence_lock);
> + seq = sequence_num++;
> + spin_unlock(&sequence_lock);
> +
> + envp [i++] = scratch;
> + scratch += sprintf(scratch, "SEQNUM=%ld", seq) + 1;

Nice thinking. It is a shame we need a lock for this, but we don't have
an atomic_inc_and_return().

Robert Love

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.103 / U:0.380 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site