lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Is there a maintainer for serverworks.c

I authored the mess.

The GPL extra names are because back in the Andrew Balsa days of the
2.0.33,4,5-Jumbo patch series Aubry, Andrzey, et al, we all worked
togather.

Only Sun (osb4,csb5a) and I (osb4,csb5,csb6,csb6a) are the true authors.

I am just lazy and do not delete people's names.

What is wrong with it all now?


Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group

On 10 Jun 2003, Alan Cox wrote:

> On Maw, 2003-06-10 at 20:18, James Washer wrote:
> >
> >
> > I see the 2.4.20 kernel ships with serverworks.c version 0.3, which
> > is GPL'd, RH9.0 ships with version 0.7 ( with no mention of GPL)
> >
> > Does anyone know the story on this? Who authored 0.7? Is it GPL'd??
>
> 0.7 is based on 0.3. Its by Michel Aubry, Andrzey, Sun and Red Hat. Not
> sure where the usual 4 line GPL blurb went. 2.4.21rc has 0.8 btw.
>
> Alan
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.033 / U:19.660 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site