lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [BK-CVS gateway] version tags
I'll go look.  CVS takes way too long to tag, it forces a rewrite of 
every file. I did attempt to filter out tags that weren't of the forn
v2.* but it looks like I screwed up.

On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 04:44:37PM +0200, Pascal Schmidt wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I noticed both the 2.4 and 2.5 BK->CVS trees don't have version tags
> any more (v2_5_70, for example, as in the old tree).
>
> Is this intentional? Did CVS take too long to tag all files or something?
>
> It was quite a nice feature to have them, very useful for finding out the
> differences between certain kernel versions. I can live without it,
> though. It's still a nice service without the tags. (Thanks!)
>
> --
> Ciao,
> Pascal

--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.032 / U:1.984 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site