[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] New x86_64 time code for 2.5.70
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 12:18, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Does it only look this way or is your white space really broken?

I generated the patch with diff -b because my original changes fixed up
a lot of broken whitespace, which somewhat obscured the functional
changes. I'll send the plain diff -u instead next time.

> On UP the sync_core is not really needed, but more reliable. May be worth
> it to stick into an #ifdef though.


> > }
> >
> > + call++;
> > +
> What's that?

Oops - a piece of instrumentation that got left behind from trying to
fix an SMP deadlock.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.070 / U:29.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site