lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] io stalls (was: -rc7 Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc6)
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:57:11PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> Ok, I see your point, we don't strictly need the waited check. I had
> added it as an optimization at first, so that those who waited once were
> not penalized by further queue_full checks.

I could taste the feeling of not penalizing while reading the code but
that's just a feeling, in reality if they blocked it means they set full
by themself and there was no request so they want to go to sleep no
matter ->full or not ;)

Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.102 / U:4.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site