lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: IDE IRQ probe brokenness.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 05:42:41PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Basically we need a "NOT_AN_IRQ" value defined either globally or per
> port

All it needs is for someone to add the definition for NO_IRQ to all
architecture header files. ARM has an established use of NO_IRQ
already with currently 34 uses:

/*
* Use this value to indicate lack of interrupt
* capability
*/
#ifndef NO_IRQ
#define NO_IRQ ((unsigned int)(-1))
#endif

I'd prefer not to do another mindless time wasteful change just because
someone decides to use a different name.

--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.031 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site