Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:37:50 +0100 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: IDE IRQ probe brokenness. |
| |
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 05:42:41PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > Basically we need a "NOT_AN_IRQ" value defined either globally or per > port
All it needs is for someone to add the definition for NO_IRQ to all architecture header files. ARM has an established use of NO_IRQ already with currently 34 uses:
/* * Use this value to indicate lack of interrupt * capability */ #ifndef NO_IRQ #define NO_IRQ ((unsigned int)(-1)) #endif
I'd prefer not to do another mindless time wasteful change just because someone decides to use a different name.
-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |