Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:46:55 -0400 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xirc2ps_cs update |
| |
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 05:35:18PM +0200, Geller Sandor wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Daniel Ritz wrote: > > > - busy_loop(HZ/25); /* wait 40 msec */ > > + Wait(HZ/25); /* wait 40 msec */ > > Why not Wait(40); instead Wait(HZ/25) ? Currently HZ is 1000. However, the > value can change - as it changed from 100 to 1000.
True enough... the best solution is to grep the tree for a msecs_to_jiffies macro, and use that. Then it will look like
Wait(msecs_to_jiffies(40))
and the macro does the proper scaling versus constant HZ.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |