[lkml]   [2003]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Question about style when converting from K&R to ANSI C.
Larry McVoy wrote:
>>Proposed conversion:
>>int foo(void)
>> /* body here */
> which is why I've always preferred
> int
> foo(void)
> {
> /* body here */
> }
> Is there some reason that I'm missing that the kernel folks like it the other
> way?

Just my personal opinion:

The return value is part of the function signature; placing it on a
separate line implies a disconnect between the return value and the rest
of the declaration.

It's a matter of psychology; your mileage may vary.

Scott Robert Ladd
Coyote Gulch Productions (

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:35    [W:0.057 / U:2.772 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site