Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 8 May 2003 18:23:45 -0700 | Subject | Re: Using GPL'd Linux drivers with non-GPL, binary-only kernel | From | Jean Tourrilhes <> |
| |
Jamie Lokier wrote : > > What's the position of kernel developers towards using the GPL'd Linux > kernel modules - that is, device drivers, network stack, filesystems > etc. - with a binary-only, closed source kernel that is written > independently of Linux?
This is the position of Donald Becker : http://www.scyld.com/expert/modules.html#legal
I would personally ask you to respect the wishes of Don with respect to all drivers containing his code, just to respect the vast contribution he made to the Linux community. My position is similar. If the author wants to make a driver available to non-GPL kernel, he can always dual license it. In fact, you will find that many external Linux drivers are available under dual licences (GPL/MPL, GPL/BSD or GPL/proprietary). For example most drivers from David Hinds (Pcmcia) are GPL/MPL.
Have fun...
Jean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |